Art Appreciation free essay sample

Empire Roman Art is a representational of their civilization, sophistication in sculpting, and of their very famous empire and their emperors. Although the Romans improved sculpting many of their ideas came from the earlier Greek civilization that perfected the human anatomy. Romans used the foundation the Greeks had accomplished years before to improve sculpting and use it as a way to pay tribute to their emperors. Roman art is categorized according to their span of governments over time. In the early period of Roman art the republic to the empire period their art improves in portraying realistic people and celebrating individualism. During the Republic period of the Roman Empire the Romans incorporated very realistic sculptures of people such as the carving of the Roman Patrician where you can see very detailed sculpting of the three men and each have individual features unlike the Greeks who would compress the best features into their sculptures. We will write a custom essay sample on Art Appreciation or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Romans would also carve in marble unlike the Greek who would arve in stone and because of that Roman sculptures are better intact than Greek sculptures. During the Empire period they would sculpt public buildings for people and they would carve them with much detail but still with greek influence. In the Late empire during early christianity much of the art work was very emperor driven much was to the emperors request and it wasnt just sculptures any more they had more of a humanistic feel, the viewer could try to find the deeper meaning. The Art Institute of Chicago holds Roman art including paintings and sculptures. Romans would sculpt with a purpose or message such as warriors or heroic scenes. The most common scenes were those of modest and natural works that you would see happening in everyday Rome like that of The Roman Patrician with Busts of His Ancestor (c. 100 BC). Rome Republic Statue of a Seated Woman 2nd Century A. D. The Art Institute of Chicago You can tell the statue is Roman because it has greek influence in the carving of the body but it has a more realistic perspective because it is not perfect and greek statues always have movement. It also isplays the drapery very close to the body making it look like if it were moving. Overall it is a carving of what anyone person could be doing unlike the greeks that would carve their gods mostly. Roman Republic Portrait of Emperor Hadrian 2nd Century A. D. The Art Institute of Chicago The statue of the emperor can right away be recognized as roman because of such detail of the face. Romans were very interested in carving real people and in individualism. Also Romans would carve their emperors. There is very much detail in this carving from the life size face to the details such as the beard and the hair. You can even see some what of a very serious face on the statue a very real expression not smiling or frowning. Portrait sculptures were more commonly found and would be a tribute to any Roman but especially the emperors. Roman Republic Fragment of a Portrait Statue of an Emperor Late 150- early 2nd Century A. D. The Art Institute of Chicago Statues of the torso were not as commonly found as much as that of portrait sculptures. You can see the greek influence in the great detail to the anatomy of the body. You can tell the statue is Roman because of the drapery echnique that the Romans would use to make the illusion of movement. Also greek sculptures would not be this adorned with detail they were much more simple and in this particular sculpture there is much detail in the clothing and you can tell he is an emperor because of the style of the clothes, it has a very royal look to it. Roman Republic Statue of Aphrodite of Knidos 2nd Century A. D. The Art Institute of Chicago The statu e is very greek in the sense that it depicts the human anatomy very well. It is also not adorned with detail in which the Romans most often did. This draws to the conclusion that this is a Roman duplicate of a greek sculpture of Aphrodite. The Romans duplicated much of the greeks work and because of that today we know of so much of the greek works and because it was carved out of marble instead of stone it was much durable over time unlike the greek originals. Roman Republic Portrait Bust of a Women A. D. 140/50 The Art Institute of Chicago Again we see in another portrait sculpture in this on we can see the detail of the womans face. It is life size and very realistic looking. She looks like an everyday Roman women not royalty at all. We see again the technique of drapery close to the body. The detail in her hair is very beautiful and simple, you can see somewhat of a hair band of flowers. Her face has a very blank look not much emotion. Over the course in history the Roman Empire is widely known for its improvements in politics, art, and the diversity of Rome unlike any other civilization at their time. Much of Roman culture was adapted from the Greeks but the Romans just improved their technique and they also acquired new forms of art. The Romans were far more realistic than the Greek. In the later years of the Roman Empire they began to sculpt public buildings and different architecture. There architecture was very much like their statue very life like and with great detail still keeping the individualism of the people. Most architectures were made for their emperors or for important people. The Ara Pacis Augustae was made for king Augustaus and in the very architecture you see carved in the interest of the king such as children and family but also telling a narrative story. The Romans were a fascinating culture that took the prior knowledge of others and made it their own with their own perspective.  In their art you can see how important society was to them and how they worshiped their emperors.